
The debate about the responsibilities of websites has recently arisen from the sexual assault of a Californian woman by a guy she met thru a dating website. CNet reports, that after the second date, with someone she met from Match.com, the man followed her home and sexually assaulted her. The man had been previously classified as a sexual offender. The woman, thru a lawsuit, is placing blame at Match.com for not protecting her from sexual offenders, and her lawyer indicates that dating websites should scan its users against a the sex-offenders database and remove offenders from the site. This case is another chapter of sex-offenders on online websites, and revisits some of the concerns when sexual offenders were found on social networking websites (i.e. MySpace, when popular; and Facebook.) There are differences between the two incidents. The concern with social networking sites, are that sexual offenders will target minors. It’s such a hot-button issue legislation was dafted, barring sex offenders from social networking sites.
With this topic, the debate, shifts in a different direction. Dating websites, like Match.com, are for adults, with the assumption that adults will be responsible for their own actions. Creating a system where dating websites screen for sexual offenders has several convoluted issues. It delves into the issue of responsibility, if a website’s sole purpose is to play as match maker, where does their responsibility begin and end? Thru this post, I want to look at some of the issues that arise, from this topic. [Read The Rest Of This Entry]


![Closeup of human hands pointing towards business man - [Social Media Week] E se fossero i Social Media ad usare Voi? Women pointing to a professionally dressed man](http://images.singlecityguy.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Social-Media-Week-E-se-fossero-i-Social-Media-ad-usare-Voi.jpg)



